Püha Chamond

Püha Chamond

RiikPrantsusmaa
TüüpKeskmine paak
Mass23 tonnes

2007 Saint-Chamond oli Esimese maailmasõja teine Prantsuse rasketank, millest 1917. aasta aprillist kuni 1918. aasta juulini toodeti 400. Kuigi see ei ole tänapäeva määratluse järgi paak, on see varajase paagi arendamise kontodel üldiselt aktsepteeritud ja kirjeldatud. Sündinud Schneider CA1 tanki valmistajatega eksisteerinud kaubanduslikust rivaalitsemisest, oli Saint-Chamond alatoidetud ja põhimõtteliselt ebapiisav disain. Selle peamine nõrkus oli Holti "caterpillar" rajad. Need olid liiga lühikesed võrreldes sõiduki pikkuse ja raske kaaluga (23 tonni). Hilisemad mudelid püüdsid siiski mõningaid paagi algseid vigu parandada, paigaldades laiemad ja tugevamad rajajalatsid, paksemad eesmised turvised ja tõhusama 75 mm Mle 1897 välipüstoli. Kokku ehitati 400 Saint-Chamondi tanki, sealhulgas 48 relvastamata Caissoni tanki. Saint-Chamondi tankid tegelesid erinevate tegevustega kuni 1918. aasta suve lõpuni, muutudes hilinemisega tõhusamaks, kuna võitlus oli kaevikutest välja liikunud ja avatud pinnale. Lõpuks pidid Saint-Chamondi tankid siiski täielikult asendama imporditud Briti rasketankidega.

Allikas: Püha Chamond Wkipedial

Saint Chamond – WalkAround
FotograafUnknow
LokaliseerimineTeadmata
Fotod68
Oota, Otsides Püha Chamondi sinu jaoks...
Saint Chamond – WalkAround
FotograafUnknow
LokaliseerimineTeadmata
Fotod47
Oota, Otsides Püha Chamondi sinu jaoks...

Overview and Context

The Saint-Chamond was the second French heavy assault tank to enter service during World War I, with approximately 400 units produced between 1917 and 1918. Born out of industrial rivalry with the manufacturers of the first French tank (the Schneider CA1), it was an ambitious but deeply flawed design.

Its primary goal was to bring the firepower of a potent artillery piece, the French 75 mm field gun, directly against enemy trenches and fortifications.

Design and Specifications

  • Shape and Hull: It had a long, boxy superstructure with significant overhangs at both the front and rear of the vehicle, extending well beyond the relatively short, narrow tracks. This gave it a massive, ungainly silhouette.
  • Main Armament: A long-barreled 75 mm gun (either the Saint-Chamond L12C TR or the standard Mle 1897 field gun in later versions) was rigidly mounted in the front of the hull, offering only a very limited traverse.
  • Secondary Armament: Four 8 mm Hotchkiss machine guns, one mounted in each side (front, rear, left, right).
  • Propulsion: The tank used a complex and innovative petrol-electric transmission system (Crochat-Colardeau). A 90 hp Panhard engine drove a generator, which in turn powered two electric motors linked separately to each track. This allowed for smooth steering but was heavy and prone to overheating and mechanical issues.
  • Crew: The tank typically required a large crew of eight to nine men.
  • Armor: Initially thin, with maximum armor plating of around 11.5 mm on the front and 8.5 mm on the sides. Later models increased side armor to 17 mm and added a spaced layer to the front to resist German armor-piercing bullets.

Combat Performance and Flaws

Despite its powerful main gun, the Saint-Chamond was plagued by critical operational deficiencies:

  • Trench Crossing: The overly long hull combined with the relatively short track length and heavy forward weight caused the tank’s nose to violently dig into the ground or get irrevocably stuck in trenches and shell craters, making it notoriously poor for traversing the scarred terrain of the Western Front.
  • Underpowered: The 90 hp engine was inadequate for the tank’s operational weight of around 23 metric tons, severely limiting its cross-country speed and agility (top speed was only about 8-12 km/h).
  • Vulnerable: Its thin side armor left the crew vulnerable to heavy machine gun fire, a major issue that was only partially addressed in late-production models.

The Saint-Chamond remained in service until late 1918, mostly performing as a iseliikuv relv or being converted into unarmed supply/recovery vehicles, as it was eventually superseded by the more reliable and tactically superior Renault FT light tank and imported British heavy tanks.

Vaadatud : 4493

Jäta vastus

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> 

Nõutav

See sait kasutab rämpsposti vähendamiseks Akismetit. Vaadake, kuidas teie kommentaariandmeid töödeldakse.